Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video629 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Stamp Kickbacks results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 493 hits. Analysis detected 3,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,516 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (11,057 of 37,536 keywords). This Food Stamp Kickbacks is worse (more manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Food Stamp Kickbacks
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠71%Food Stamp Kickbacks (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,516
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Food Stamp Kickbacks attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Food Stamp Kickbacks vs sitewide
Food Stamp Kickbacks attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos