Keyword summary
79%8 analyzed articles/videos7,696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Insecurity results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 3,745 hits. Analysis detected 28,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,568 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (25,785 of 28,402 keywords). This Food Insecurity is better (less manipulative) than 90.80% of the peer group.
Food Insecurity
Keyword details
Total words: 37,568
Article count: 8
Authors
Showing top 48 attributes by prevalence for chart readability.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Food Insecurity attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Food Insecurity vs sitewide
Food Insecurity attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.