Keyword summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Feeding Our Future Scandal results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 317 hits. Analysis detected 1,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,022 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (8,600 of 33,961 keywords). This Feeding Our Future Scandal is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Feeding Our Future Scandal
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Radio Broadcasts1%
⁠0%Metropolitan Opera1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠75%Feeding Our Future Scandal (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,022
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Feeding Our Future Scandal attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Feeding Our Future Scandal vs sitewide
Feeding Our Future Scandal attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos