Keyword summary
⁠40%2 analyzed articles/videos1,157 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Feeding Our Future results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 575 hits. Analysis detected 3,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,285 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,980 of 28,623 keywords). This Feeding Our Future is better (less manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Feeding Our Future
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠48%Feeding Our Future (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,285
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Feeding Our Future attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Feeding Our Future vs sitewide
Feeding Our Future attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos