Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Tort Claims Act results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 1,250 hits. Analysis detected 7,166 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,330 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,491 of 28,615 keywords). This Federal Tort Claims Act is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Federal Tort Claims Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠60%Federal Tort Claims Act (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,330
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Tort Claims Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Tort Claims Act vs sitewide
Federal Tort Claims Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos