Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Nutrition Program results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 575 hits. Analysis detected 3,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,473 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Nutrition Program is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Federal Nutrition Program
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Nutrition Program attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Nutrition Program vs sitewide
Federal Nutrition Program attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.