Keyword summary
95%7 analyzed articles/videos4,492 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Judges results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 3,845 hits. Analysis detected 37,094 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,733 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (11,674 of 28,232 keywords). This Federal Judges is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Federal Judges
Keyword details
Total words: 21,733
Article count: 7
Authors
Showing top 48 attributes by prevalence for chart readability.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Judges attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Judges vs sitewide
Federal Judges attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.