Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video305 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Judge Decision results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Circular Reasoning, and Begging the Question, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 480 faulty-reasoning hits from 915 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 70% (8,621 of 28,615 keywords). This Federal Judge Decision is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Federal Judge Decision
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Judge Decision attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Judge Decision vs sitewide
Federal Judge Decision attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.