Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Grand Jury results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 776 hits. Analysis detected 4,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,612 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 72% (8,286 of 28,628 keywords). This Federal Grand Jury is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group.
Federal Grand Jury
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Grand Jury attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Grand Jury vs sitewide
Federal Grand Jury attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.