Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Funding Cuts results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Red Herring as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 329 hits. Analysis detected 2,342 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (14,101 of 28,615 keywords). This Federal Funding Cuts is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Federal Funding Cuts
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠51%Federal Funding Cuts (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,588
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Funding Cuts attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Funding Cuts vs sitewide
Federal Funding Cuts attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos