Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video527 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Election Policy results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Out-Group Homogeneity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 330 hits. Analysis detected 2,225 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,074 of 28,615 keywords). This Federal Election Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Federal Election Policy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠72%Federal Election Policy (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,108
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Election Policy attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Election Policy vs sitewide
Federal Election Policy attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos