Keyword summary
71%13 analyzed articles/videos9,713 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Courts results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 5,530 hits. Analysis detected 49,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 55,732 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (23,552 of 26,650 keywords). This Federal Courts is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group.
Federal Courts
Keyword details
Total words: 55,732
Article count: 13
Authors
Showing top 48 attributes by prevalence for chart readability.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Courts attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Courts vs sitewide
Federal Courts attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.