Keyword summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Child Nutrition Program results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 317 hits. Analysis detected 1,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,022 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (8,599 of 33,961 keywords). This Federal Child Nutrition Program is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Federal Child Nutrition Program
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Radio Broadcasts1%
⁠0%Metropolitan Opera1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠75%Federal Child Nutrition Program (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,022
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Child Nutrition Program attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Child Nutrition Program vs sitewide
Federal Child Nutrition Program attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos