Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fed Interest Rates results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 1,903 hits. Analysis detected 6,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,224 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (24,930 of 37,536 keywords). This Fed Interest Rates is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Fed Interest Rates
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠34%Fed Interest Rates (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,224
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Fed Interest Rates attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Fed Interest Rates vs sitewide
Fed Interest Rates attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos