Keyword summary
0%7 analyzed articles/videos6,631 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Epstein Files Transparency Act results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 5,816 hits. Analysis detected 31,534 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,019 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (10,763 of 28,615 keywords). This Epstein Files Transparency Act is worse (more manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Epstein Files Transparency Act
Keyword details
Total words: 20,019
Article count: 7
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Epstein Files Transparency Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Epstein Files Transparency Act vs sitewide
Epstein Files Transparency Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.