Keyword summary
13%1 analyzed article/video1,171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Consumption Tax results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Unattributed Quote, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 267 hits. Analysis detected 1,815 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,513 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (29,554 of 33,789 keywords). This Energy Consumption Tax is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group.
Energy Consumption Tax
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Energy Consumption Tax attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Energy Consumption Tax vs sitewide
Energy Consumption Tax attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.