Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,088 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Endangered Species Act results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 323 hits. Analysis detected 2,255 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,352 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (25,361 of 28,628 keywords). This Endangered Species Act is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group.
Endangered Species Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠12%Endangered Species Act (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,352
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Endangered Species Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Endangered Species Act vs sitewide
Endangered Species Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos