BS Summary: These Endangered Habitats results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 816 hits. Analysis detected 4,924 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (7,432 of 23,516 keywords). This Endangered Habitats is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Endangered Habitats
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Wholegrains0%
⁠0%Weed0%
⁠0%Wang Wen0%
⁠0%Vegetation Fire0%
⁠0%U S House0%
⁠69%Endangered Habitats (selected)5%
⁠100%Reuven Carlyle60%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Endangered Habitats attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Endangered Habitats vs All Other Publications
Endangered Habitats attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.