Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,359 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Embargoes And Sanctions results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 539 hits. Analysis detected 5,378 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,070 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (20,860 of 28,615 keywords). This Embargoes And Sanctions is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Embargoes And Sanctions
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Embargoes And Sanctions attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Embargoes And Sanctions vs sitewide
Embargoes And Sanctions attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.