Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elon Musk Twitter Shareholders Class Action Verdict results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 336 hits. Analysis detected 1,592 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,330 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (20,176 of 28,973 keywords). This Elon Musk Twitter Shareholders Class Action Verdict is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Elon Musk Twitter Shareholders Class Action Verdict
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠31%Elon Musk Twitter Shareholders Class Action Verdict (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,330
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Elon Musk Twitter Shareholders Class Action Verdict attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Elon Musk Twitter Shareholders Class Action Verdict vs sitewide
Elon Musk Twitter Shareholders Class Action Verdict attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos