Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,365 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Tampering results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 504 hits. Analysis detected 3,668 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (20,694 of 28,615 keywords). This Election Tampering is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Election Tampering
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Election Tampering attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Election Tampering vs sitewide
Election Tampering attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.