Keyword summary
100%1 analyzed article/video200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Scheme results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Confirmation Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 39.9% saturation with 319 hits. Analysis detected 1,682 faulty-reasoning hits from 800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,891 of 26,596 keywords). This Election Scheme is worse (more manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group.
Election Scheme
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Election Scheme attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Election Scheme vs sitewide
Election Scheme attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.