Keyword summary
87%1 analyzed article/video928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Conspiracies results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 565 hits. Analysis detected 3,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (12,908 of 28,569 keywords). This Election Conspiracies is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Election Conspiracies
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Election Conspiracies attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Election Conspiracies vs sitewide
Election Conspiracies attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.