Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diplomatic Negotiations results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 343 hits. Analysis detected 2,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (10,690 of 28,628 keywords). This Diplomatic Negotiations is worse (more manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.
Diplomatic Negotiations
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Diplomatic Negotiations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Diplomatic Negotiations vs sitewide
Diplomatic Negotiations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.