BS Summary: These Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals Daca results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 761 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 59% (9,431 of 22,929 keywords). This Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals Daca is worse (more manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals Daca
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals Daca attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals Daca vs All Other Publications
Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals Daca attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.