Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,185 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defamation Law results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 436 hits. Analysis detected 1,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,273 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (19,464 of 28,615 keywords). This Defamation Law is better (less manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
Defamation Law
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Defamation Law attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Defamation Law vs sitewide
Defamation Law attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.