Keyword summary
â 0%1 analyzed article/video822 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Stearns results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 625 hits. Analysis detected 5,781 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of â 77% (6,579 of 28,663 keywords). This David Stearns is worse (more manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
David Stearns
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Stearns attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Stearns vs sitewide
David Stearns attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.