Keyword summary
66%2 analyzed articles/videos2,661 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Sacks results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 898 hits. Analysis detected 11,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,026 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (18,927 of 31,375 keywords). This David Sacks is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
David Sacks
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Sacks attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Sacks vs sitewide
David Sacks attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.