Keyword summary
55%1 analyzed article/video337 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Neeleman results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 1,087 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 65% (17,499 of 49,419 keywords). This David Neeleman is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
David Neeleman
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Neeleman attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Neeleman vs sitewide
David Neeleman attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.