Keyword summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos2,213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Hearn results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 982 hits. Analysis detected 10,406 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,988 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,762 of 37,536 keywords). This David Hearn is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group.
David Hearn
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Hearn attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Hearn vs sitewide
David Hearn attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.