Keyword summary
⁠33%5 analyzed articles/videos7,373 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dating Apps results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 3,601 hits. Analysis detected 27,548 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,302 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (22,545 of 25,938 keywords). This Dating Apps is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Dating Apps
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠14%Dating Apps (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Showing top 48 attributes by prevalence for chart readability.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Dating Apps attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Dating Apps vs All Other Publications
Dating Apps attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos