Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video470 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Abrams results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Out-Group Homogeneity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 246 hits. Analysis detected 1,979 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,811 of 37,536 keywords). This Dan Abrams is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Dan Abrams
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Dan Abrams attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Dan Abrams vs sitewide
Dan Abrams attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.