Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crowdsourcing results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 820 hits. Analysis detected 5,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,498 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 68% (9,299 of 28,625 keywords). This Crowdsourcing is worse (more manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
Crowdsourcing
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Crowdsourcing attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Crowdsourcing vs sitewide
Crowdsourcing attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.