Keyword summary
⁠21%1 analyzed article/video1,469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Court Dispute results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Self-Serving Bias, and Red Herring, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 664 hits. Analysis detected 2,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,407 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (25,431 of 32,735 keywords). This Court Dispute is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Court Dispute
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠23%Court Dispute (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,407
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Court Dispute attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Court Dispute vs sitewide
Court Dispute attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos