Keyword summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video552 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Transparency Act results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.5% saturation with 604 hits. Analysis detected 3,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (4,286 of 34,833 keywords). This Corporate Transparency Act is worse (more manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
Corporate Transparency Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠88%Corporate Transparency Act (selected)7%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,656
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Corporate Transparency Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Corporate Transparency Act vs sitewide
Corporate Transparency Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos