BS Summary: These Consumer Financial Protection Bureau results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 337 hits. Analysis detected 1,507 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 69% (7,298 of 23,317 keywords). This Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Wholegrains0%
0%Weed0%
0%Wang Wen0%
0%Vegetation Fire0%
0%U S House0%
69%Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (selected)5%
100%Reuven Carlyle60%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,624
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau vs All Other Publications
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.