Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video547 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conservation Officers results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 178 hits. Analysis detected 1,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,188 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (15,044 of 28,615 keywords). This Conservation Officers is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Conservation Officers
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Conservation Officers attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Conservation Officers vs sitewide
Conservation Officers attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.