Keyword summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Losses results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Confirmation Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 39.9% saturation with 319 hits. Analysis detected 1,682 faulty-reasoning hits from 800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,890 of 26,596 keywords). This Congressional Losses is worse (more manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group.
Congressional Losses
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠93%Congressional Losses (selected)10%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 800
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Congressional Losses attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Congressional Losses vs sitewide
Congressional Losses attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos