Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video841 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conde Nast results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 543 hits. Analysis detected 3,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (10,089 of 28,615 keywords). This Conde Nast is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Conde Nast
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Conde Nast attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Conde Nast vs sitewide
Conde Nast attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.