Keyword summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video1,100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Compete Act results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 520 hits. Analysis detected 3,270 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (19,427 of 27,012 keywords). This Compete Act is better (less manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Compete Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠29%Compete Act (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,400
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Compete Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Compete Act vs sitewide
Compete Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos