Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Wildfire Defense Grant results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 224 hits. Analysis detected 1,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,427 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (27,682 of 28,615 keywords). This Community Wildfire Defense Grant is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group.
Community Wildfire Defense Grant
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠4%Community Wildfire Defense Grant (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,427
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Community Wildfire Defense Grant attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Community Wildfire Defense Grant vs sitewide
Community Wildfire Defense Grant attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos