Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video3,651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Development Administration results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Anecdotal, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 971 hits. Analysis detected 6,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,302 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,754 of 28,625 keywords). This Community Development Administration is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group.
Community Development Administration
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠35%Community Development Administration (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,302
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Community Development Administration attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Community Development Administration vs sitewide
Community Development Administration attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos