Keyword summary
36%1 analyzed article/video1,152 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Commodity Futures Trading Commission results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Begging the Question, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 433 hits. Analysis detected 2,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (34,027 of 44,475 keywords). This Commodity Futures Trading Commission is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,608
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Commodity Futures Trading Commission attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Commodity Futures Trading Commission vs sitewide
Commodity Futures Trading Commission attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos