Keyword summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video562 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College Transparency Act results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 521 hits. Analysis detected 3,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (4,896 of 38,330 keywords). This College Transparency Act is worse (more manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group.
College Transparency Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Wyomings Big Show1%
⁠0%Wyoming's Big Show1%
⁠0%Sweetwater Events Complex1%
⁠0%Rock Springs1%
⁠0%Ffa1%
⁠88%College Transparency Act (selected)7%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,248
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
College Transparency Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
College Transparency Act vs sitewide
College Transparency Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos