Keyword summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,346 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College Football Playoff results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, In-Group Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 1,715 hits. Analysis detected 19,021 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,165 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (9,922 of 28,974 keywords). This College Football Playoff is worse (more manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
College Football Playoff
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠66%College Football Playoff (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,165
Article count: 4
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
College Football Playoff attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
College Football Playoff vs sitewide
College Football Playoff attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos