Keyword summary
17%1 analyzed article/video1,488 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coal Energy results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 206 hits. Analysis detected 1,844 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (28,688 of 33,509 keywords). This Coal Energy is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.
Coal Energy
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Coal Energy attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Coal Energy vs sitewide
Coal Energy attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.