Keyword summary
⁠38%2 analyzed articles/videos3,018 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clean Water Act results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 2,433 hits. Analysis detected 13,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,320 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (23,541 of 25,937 keywords). This Clean Water Act is better (less manipulative) than 90.80% of the peer group.
Clean Water Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠10%Clean Water Act (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 19,320
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Clean Water Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Clean Water Act vs sitewide
Clean Water Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos