Keyword summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video1,461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clean Energy Fund results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 402 hits. Analysis detected 2,959 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,383 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (26,923 of 37,536 keywords). This Clean Energy Fund is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
Clean Energy Fund
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠29%Clean Energy Fund (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,383
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Clean Energy Fund attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Clean Energy Fund vs sitewide
Clean Energy Fund attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos