Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,720 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Claims For Damages results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 1,287 hits. Analysis detected 6,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (15,794 of 29,241 keywords). This Claims For Damages is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Claims For Damages
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Claims For Damages attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Claims For Damages vs sitewide
Claims For Damages attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.