Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These City Of Austin Planning Commission results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Status Quo Bias, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 219 hits. Analysis detected 1,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 28,237 keywords). This City Of Austin Planning Commission is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
City Of Austin Planning Commission
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%City Of Austin Planning Commission (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,788
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
City Of Austin Planning Commission attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
City Of Austin Planning Commission vs sitewide
City Of Austin Planning Commission attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos